Just want to clarify - the remove rebase proposal has been facilitated by the team, but it’s not coming from the team specifically. It’s a response to the community’s push to remove it. Additionally, no proposal can move forward if it doesn’t get enough community support. The process usually begins with informal conversations on our Discord and here on the Forum, then a Request for Feedback/Forum poll on a correctly formatted YIP (“Yam Improvement Proposal”),then a snapshot vote that meets quorum requirements, and then finally an on-chain vote. So there are, at minimum, three touch-points where the community can weigh in on any proposed changes and communicate how they feel about them and whether they think there should be changes to the proposal. It’s not something that the contributor team can unilaterally push through. Also, I don’t think that’s healthy leadership, even if we could do that.
That said, I hear you on mourning the rebase. What I can say is that I think there are still plenty of people in our community who value rebase and the potential it could have in the future, so there’s a very strong likelihood that we launch a different rebasing token as a Yam product in the future through our Yam Factory initiative. If that’s something you are interested in, I strongly recommend you visit the Discord and advocate for some kind of elastic finance product in the #yam-factory discord channel.
只是想澄清-团队已为移除变基提案提供了便利，但它并非专门来自团队。这是对社区推动将其删除的回应。此外，如果没有足够的社区支持，任何提案都无法向前推进。该过程通常从在我们的Discord和论坛上的非正式对话开始，然后是在格式正确的YIP（“ Yam Improvement Proposal”）上进行“反馈/论坛”民意调查，然后根据满足法定人数的要求进行快照投票，然后最终链上投票。因此，社区至少可以在三个接触点上权衡任何提议的更改，并交流他们对提议的看法以及他们是否认为应该对该提议进行更改。贡献者团队无法单方面推动这一过程。另外，即使我们可以做到，我也不认为这是健康的领导才能。